PolymarketOpenSports

Counter-Strike: Aurora Gaming vs Liquid (BO3) - IEM Beijing Group B

View on Polymarket ↗
Closing soon — trading ends 1 h from now at Nov 2, 05:40 ET. Liquidity often thins out near the close.
Implied probability
0.1%
0.1¢ per contract
1 hour
−40.5 pts down
24 hours
−70.5 pts down
7 days
−76.5 pts down
Polymarket
Counter-Strike: Aurora Gaming vs Liquid (BO3) - IEM Beijing Group B implied probability. Polymarket moved from 24% to 0%. Times shown in EST.0%20%40%60%80%100%00:35 ET00:42 ET00:50 ET00:57 ET01:05 ET$3,001 NO at 99.9%$9,600 NO at 99.9%

Market statistics

24h volume
$580K
Total volume
$390K
Liquidity
$471K
Open interest
—
Spread
—
Best bid / ask
—
Closes
Nov 2, 05:40 ET
Status
open
Hourly volume

Order book

Executable asks for both outcomes, deepest first

Order book unavailable

The venue did not return resting depth for this contract. Quotes and history above are unaffected.

Why is this moving?

Evidence-grounded explanation

Aurora Gaming odds collapse to near zero after heavy NO buying and market halt

Moderate evidence
Observed
Established from data

The implied probability for Aurora Gaming winning dropped from 70.5% to 0.1% over the last 24 hours.

Established from data

In the final hour, the price fell by another 40.5 points.

Established from data

Between 23:33 ET and 23:49 ET, three large trades bought 'NO' (betting against Aurora) at prices between 31% and 42%, totaling approximately $34,243.

Established from data

At 00:18 ET, a single large trade of $36,224 executed on the 'YES' side at 41%.

Established from data

By 01:05 ET, the market price moved from 24% to 0%.

Plausible explanation
Consistent with the evidence, not proven

The sustained buying of 'NO' shares in the late evening suggests traders were positioning against Aurora Gaming's victory, driving the price down.

Consistent with the evidence, not proven

The sharp drop to 0% shortly after the final recorded trades indicates the market likely resolved or became illiquid as the outcome was determined, consistent with a loss for Aurora Gaming.

Caveats
  • The evidence does not specify the actual match result or reason for the price collapse beyond trading activity.

Evidence score 39/100. Ordering in time establishes correlation, not causation. Narrative written by qwen/qwen3.8-flash from a fixed evidence package and validated against it before publication; every figure is computed by ProudGlobeHead Markets.

Event timeline

Reconstructed from snapshots and trades
  1. Large Polymarket NO execution: $11,633 at 31%
  2. Large Polymarket NO execution: $10,842 at 32%
  3. Large Polymarket NO execution: $11,768 at 42%
  4. Large Polymarket YES execution: $36,224 at 41%
  5. Polymarket moves 24% → 0%

Largest recent trades

By notional value
MarketTimeSidePriceSizeNotionalBefore+5 minMoveImpact
Counter-Strike: Aurora Gaming vs Liquid (BO3) - IEM Beijing Group BSports · Polymarket ↗01:08 ET3 h agoLiquid sell99.9%3.0K$2,997———Normal
Counter-Strike: Aurora Gaming vs Liquid (BO3) - IEM Beijing Group BSports · Polymarket ↗01:03 ET3 h agoLiquid sell99.9%3.0K$3,001———Normal
Counter-Strike: Aurora Gaming vs Liquid (BO3) - IEM Beijing Group BSports · Polymarket ↗01:03 ET3 h agoLiquid sell99.9%9.6K$9,600———Normal
Counter-Strike: Aurora Gaming vs Liquid (BO3) - IEM Beijing Group BSports · Polymarket ↗00:26 ET4 h agoLiquid buy59.0%18K$10,736—23.5%—Normal
Counter-Strike: Aurora Gaming vs Liquid (BO3) - IEM Beijing Group BSports · Polymarket ↗00:18 ET4 h agoAurora Gaming buy41.0%88K$36,224—23.5%—Normal
Counter-Strike: Aurora Gaming vs Liquid (BO3) - IEM Beijing Group BSports · Polymarket ↗00:12 ET4 h agoAurora Gaming buy41.0%20K$8,292———Normal
Counter-Strike: Aurora Gaming vs Liquid (BO3) - IEM Beijing Group BSports · Polymarket ↗23:49 ET4 h agoLiquid buy42.0%28K$11,768———Normal
Counter-Strike: Aurora Gaming vs Liquid (BO3) - IEM Beijing Group BSports · Polymarket ↗23:34 ET5 h agoLiquid buy32.0%34K$10,842———Normal
Counter-Strike: Aurora Gaming vs Liquid (BO3) - IEM Beijing Group BSports · Polymarket ↗23:33 ET5 h agoLiquid buy31.0%38K$11,633———Normal

Most price-impactful trades

Ranked by realised movement adjusted for liquidity — not the same as the largest

No impact measured yet

Impact is computed once five minutes of post-trade price history exists for a print.